Posted on October 18, 2013 at 5:46 am
More Letters of the Week
By Carolyn Yeager
In January 2011, I featured a Letter of the Week from Hailey S. In November the same year I featured two more, from Shelby and Sarah. Now I have received three more complaints about this site from (another?) Hailey, a Katie and a Lauren — right in a row. Thank you ladies!
But it’s an odd thing — the latest three were all sent from the same computer. And with an email address that ends in the same edu., which I won’t reveal. I’m not even sure it’s legitimate … that is, a real school. Could these young ladies be friends conspiring together in writing their comments? Could they even be the same person using different names and slightly different email addresses?
The content and point of view is similar, but written in different ways. You will find that “belief” and “believing” are the major basis for, well, believing the “holocaust.” These comments are also similar to the earlier ones I published from Hailey S, Shelby and Sarah, although better written and thought-out. So I could reply to them all together, but since they are written to three different blog articles they appear on different pages. This is why I decided to reply to them here, under the title of “More Letters of the Week.”
First, from Hailey, who sent her comment to “Elie’s Adventures in Buchenland” on Oct. 14:
I find the trivialization of the Holocaust extremely disgusting. It maybe that some don’t believe that Elie Wiesel was an actual part of the Holocaust, but that does not mean anyone has the right to make fun of or make light of a horrific historical event. An event that almost entirely wiped out an entire group of people. There is an amount of dignity that must be maintained when dealing with this horrific time in history.
I already replied to Hailey on that page, so I’ll just say here that she’s free to express her feelings but I hope she understands that that is all she’s doing. Hailey has been indoctrinated into believing that “Holocaust survivors” are telling the truth about their “horrific” suffering and that “an entire group of people [by which she means Jewish people] were almost entirely wiped out.” Honest research has shown otherwise, but Hailey prefers to ignore this research.
The second comment is from Katie, who sent her comment to “Elie Wiesel Was Not in Buchenwald Made Simple“ on Oct. 16:
I think that there could be a logical explanation to explain the holes in Elie’s story. I cannot bring myself to believe that someone would fictionalize a story on the holocaust and its terrible events. When someone under goes a traumatic event they will most likely not be able to remember every detail perfectly therefore he may have been confused on the dates and times. Elie has also grown older in age which also may make it difficult for him to remember. His book Night, is very detailed and descriptive which makes it difficult to believe that he could make those events up. This blog also states that Elie has not been asked to explain his discrepancies in his “tale”. Could it possibly be because there is no solid proof to question his story? And if he wasn’t actually a survivor than his book is still an incredible account of a Jewish person in the Holocaust and is still educational and provides people with an insight to the terrible things that happened.
Poor logic here. Katie says, “I cannot bring myself to believe …” — she is also putting her belief first. How many times can we repeat that reality is not about belief. It’s about facts and evidence. Belief belongs in religion — in this case the religion they have all been brought up in: Holocaustism.
Katie brings up belief a second time, saying in essence that after reading Night, she finds it “difficult to believe that he could make those events up.” But Wiesel is primarily a fiction writer and has made up lots of stories about Jews; in fact Night was for a long time listed and sold as fiction! Good fiction makes us believe it’s real even when we know better.
As to the “logical explanation” Katie thinks could be found, she doesn’t come up with one. Illogically, she says that Elie was traumatized and thus not able to remember well. But Elie has always said he waited for 10 years to write his book so that he would have a clearer mind about it. Her other “logical explanation” is: Elie is now elderly and has a poor memory, thus he gets mixed up on dates and times. But Elie wrote Night in 1955, and it is in this book that the problems exist — the book itself is inaccurate and inconsistent. Since that time he has continued to say different things — inconsistent things.
Katie’s final remark falls back on what the bulk of “Holocaust” defenders come up with: Even if he wasn’t a survivor, it’s still an “incredible [fictional] account” providing an insight into the terrible things that happened. How does he know what happened if he wasn’t there? He made it all up, taking the framework for what others had already said about it. Stop defending this multi-millionaire shyster, Katie.
Third, is Lauren, who sent her comment to “Ken Waltzer inadvertently supplies proof that Elie Wiesel was not at Buchenwald“ on Oct. 16:
I find this constant speculation about the validity of the Holocaust and its survivors extremely disturbing. The Holocaust was not a glamorous event, therefore, I find it hard to believe that someone would make up a story about being a victim of such tragedy. While I realize that many people would consider my opinion to be a ‘too optimistic’ view of human nature and morality, there is a lot of information to support the fact that Elie Wiesel was at the camp without the information that Mr. Waltzer is supposedly with-holding.
Once more, we find the belief mode: “I find it hard to believe that someone would make up a story…” Why? Hundreds of fake survivors have done so. What does it take for you to give up this childish belief in a religion of sadistically persecuted Jews?
You say it is not a glamorous event … but for ordinary “non-glamorous” Jews it is the ultimate stardom, and a very lucrative source of money too. Not only from the books they write, but also from the talks they give on the “speakers circuit” — and how they love all that respectful attention. They also love fooling so many Gentiles.
You say “there is a lot of information to support the fact that Elie Wiesel was at the camp …” No, there isn’t! This entire web site is devoted to showing that the alleged “information” is false or simply does not exist. Yet you cling to your belief in the non-existent. That is religion, not history, Lauren.
You are also mis-stating the case when you say Mr. Waltzer is withholding information. He is withholding nothing, for he doesn’t have the information he claims. Your Mr. Waltzer is another fraud who’s been caught in his frivolous promises. I know it’s tough for you to accept. But logic should tell you that if Waltzer had the information he would have put it out there already. He is embarrassing himself as a university professor by remaining silent and not publishing it. In failing to do so, he is proving my point … not yours.
Well, young ladies, thanks for your written words. They are a treasure. You are of course welcome to write again, but I caution you that I expect you to address my replies to you in some way. If you just write more of the same I probably won’t publish it. I don’t want to bore the readers. So step up to the plate!
Categories Featured | Tags: belief vs evidence, Buchenwald, Elie Wiesel, history vs religion, Holocaustism, Kenneth Waltzer, Letter of the Week
Leave a Reply
By submitting a comment here you grant Elie Wiesel Cons the World a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.
18 Comments to More Letters of the Week
by brucewhain
On October 19, 2013 at 3:35 pm
“I find the trivialization of the Holocaust extremely disgusting.”
I don’t see how you can call it trivialization when Germans are being constantly defamed by a person who is a known liar on particulars of the so-called Holocaust. I’m not calling you a liar, but you’re not telling the truth.
The 2nd letter is more of the same agitprop designed to be read by people who read this website – quite consciously – and shows the writer’s dictatorial urge, not very flatteringly, to strong-arm censorship of it.
by Ministry Of Truth
On October 21, 2013 at 4:05 pm
Throw him his 30 dollar coins and Elie Wiesel quickly forgets his great principles and shamelessly endorses the new Über Racist Prize.
by Eliza Jane
On October 28, 2013 at 10:48 am
This is absolutely ridiculous! Don’t listen to this dumb woman! She doesn’t know what she is talking about! She is a bad person!
by Samantha
On October 30, 2013 at 1:17 pm
What exactly are your credentials to write about this topic, Carolyn? Silence? That’s what I thought. Might as well bring out the tin foil hats and preach that the illuminati are taking over.
by jp
On November 6, 2013 at 12:08 pm
Almost nothing Misha Defonseca wrote about herself or her horrific childhood during the Holocaust was true.
She didn’t live with a pack of wolves to escape the Nazis. She didn’t trek 1,900 miles across Europe in search of her deported parents, nor kill a German soldier in self-defense. She’s not even Jewish.
Misha Defonseca, a Belgian writer now living in Massachusetts, admitted through her lawyers this week that her best-selling book, “Misha: A Memoire of the Holocaust Years,” was an elaborate fantasy she kept repeating, even as the book was translated into 18 languages and made into a feature film in France.
“This story is mine. It is not actually reality, but my reality, my way of surviving,”
Misha Defonseca is not the only one. As honest Jews and other survivors of German labor camps continue getting their voices heard despite decades of systematic suppression, their accurate accounts of daily life in Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor or Dachau whereby laborers had sport and other recreational facilities available to use, had theaters with regular performances or orchestras they played in, it becomes increasingly more and more difficult for pathological Holocaust liars to sustain their blatant lies.
by jp
On November 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Just for Lauren and the other LIARS!! people have been fraudulently perpetuating the MYTH
by Brendan
On November 10, 2013 at 2:56 pm
Night is a book that has really changed my perspective of the holocaust. I used to not really care and just blow through those discussions in history, but I felt a really involved in this book. When I was reading it, I found myself acting as if I were Elie Wiesel. I felt a strong connection with the book and highly recommend it.
by Carolyn
On November 11, 2013 at 3:26 am
Brendan – If you were “acting as if you were Elie Wiesel” when reading the book, you are very impressionable and obviously utilize empathy over a critical intellect. Maybe you will grow out of it eventually.
by John
On November 11, 2013 at 3:38 pm
Carolyn, how do you write the thousands of bodies found off as a hoax? How do you justify not believing in camps you can visit today? How do you declare eyewitness’s accounts and actual photographic evidence false? Why do you continue in your struggle against the existence of a proven part of human history? Your circulation of such conspiracy theories is ridiculous.
by Carolyn
On November 11, 2013 at 6:04 pm
So now you are John Smith. Okay. Even though you can only ask questions but not answer them, I will answer your questions.
How do I write off “thousands of bodies found?” I don’t write off anything, but what “thousands of bodies,” and found where? Do I have to formulate your questions for you?
How do I justify not believing in camps? I don’t “not believe in camps.” Where did I ever say that? I wrote a booklet on the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp memorial museum which I visited. But, truthfully speaking, most “camps” don’t exist anymore. But then, how would you know?
Why do I continue in my struggle against proven human history? Haha, that’s too silly to even answer, and you’re not even wanting an answer, you’re making a statement.
Your opinion is totally irrelevant. You show yourself and your ilk to be pathetic.
by Edward Khalil
On November 26, 2013 at 7:08 pm
If All Jews Suddenly Died…
The ghost of Josef Goebels would scream “Wow!!! How the hell did you do that so quickly???”
Force of habit would cause Howard Stern’s jaws to flap for an additional 6 weeks.
Ariel Sharon’s (already) bloated carcass could be cargo dropped in Africa to stave off the next inevitable famine in Somalia. (Not that I care!)
Re-runs of “Seinfeld’ would be called “Kramer” since he was the real star of the program. Please note the entire cast would be dead.
Universities could replace programs such as “Holocaust Studies” with something more useful, like “Pathos in the Noh Drama”, or “The History of Woolen Goods”.
No longer would any child have to bear the burden of a moniker such as Ziv or Shlomo.
CNN would be forced to initiate an immediate hiring campaign.
Barbara Streisand would look the same.
The ACLU would have 7 remaining persons on their membership list; NAMBLA would not have anyone.
North American professional sports franchises would lose 37 owners, but not a single athlete.
The Academy Awards would start going to the best movies, not the ones with a “holocaust” theme.
Surnames, denoting precious metals, jewelry and other terms of wealth and materialism would go out of existence. I.e., Goldstein, Silverberg, Ruby, Pearlman, Diamond, etc.
No branch of any of the US military services would lose a single member.
Mel Gibson would pour himself a double scotch.
Young people would begin applying to medical schools, hoping to ease the pain of the suffering rather than to amass small fortunes running abortion mills or performing unnecessary plastic surgeries.
The next issue of the Brooklyn phone book would be 17 oz. lighter.
The “Larry King Show” would finally be off the air…. Good riddance!!!
Pawn shops and furriers would go the way of dodo birds and the wooly mammoth.
America would lose one “ally” but would gain fifty-six others.
American blacks would move up from the number two spot on the list of the “most oppressed whiners.”
Historians and academicians could boldly state that only 5.99 millions Jews died under Hitler without fear of losing their scholastic positions.
The West Bank and Gaza would still look like cesspools.
In America alone, there would be 7,657,23 less defense lawyers, and 46 less prosecuting attorneys.
Joan River’s cadaverous face would appear more attractive.
The majority of surviving comedians would actually be funny. Take note Adam Sandler, Howie Mandel, et. al. The list of not-funny Kike “comedians is legendary.
Western nations could save millions by avoiding the cost of erecting “holocaust” memorials, museums and other appeasing and politically correct facades.
The grave diggers at Arlington National Cemetery would not be negatively impacted.
The term “free press” would actually take on meaning.
America could pay to resurface the roads of Detroit, instead of the roads in Tel Aviv.
AND…
The sun would shine a little brighter, while the birds would seem to sing a little more beautifully.
by Liam
On January 15, 2014 at 8:29 am
@ Edward Khalil
“only 5.99 MILLION JEWS died under Hitler”
So, while searching for quotes to finish my English summative, I stumbled upon this happy little community. I understand that the admin doesn’t believe Wiesel to be %100 truthful, or maybe he thinks that he is completely full of shit, I don’t care.
I’m fairly sure that some of the events are exaggerated or were added by editors for their dramatic effect, but that shouldn’t take away from the fact that THE HALOCAUST WAS A REAL THING. Terrible things were done by terrible people. I’m not saying all Germans and their allies where evil, only a few ringleaders, who made the poor, terrified nation of regular people do terrible things.
Just because you don’t believe that Wiesel’s account wasn’t affected by anger or sadness or greed, doesn’t give you the right to blame all the worlds problems on the Jews. Isn’t that how WWII and the holocaust all started, anyways?
by Carolyn
On January 19, 2014 at 8:12 am
Hi Liam,
This is the admin. Please tell me exactly what “terrible things were done by terrible people” that you have knowledge about. Remember to give the source from whence this information comes, or why you know it’s true.
FYI, the German nation at that time was not made up of “poor, terrified, regular people” who were “made to do terrible things.” Where does that idea come from? Your school lessons? Let’s please get down to the nitty-gritty and not just talk in generalities. I do that in the articles on this site. Never mind what Edward Khalil says … he’s a comment writer same as you who has a right to his opinion. He thinks the world would be better off without Jews. Would you say that dislike of Jews, for cause, was what started WWII? Think about that.
I hope you will answer. It’s darn hard to get a half-way intelligent discussion going on these pages.
by Carolyn
On January 27, 2014 at 6:29 am
What happened to Liam? He wanted to come on here and complain and point the finger at the Third Reich, but cannot write intelligently about the behavior of Jews and their “holocaust” that he believes in. Not one of them ever has.
by bahar
On February 12, 2014 at 9:00 pm
It’s sad that this website is still up, the amount of time, money and energy you are putting into this is quite ridiculous. Though, with all the effort you are putting into making him a fraud, why not use it to good use, to make a difference in the world? This is clearly not doing that and what’s even more disgraceful is the fact that you ask people to donate…..if it was up to me, I would have this site shut down. I don’t care about what you may or may not have as “facts” just the subject of this site makes me cringe, do something useful with your life.
by Carolyn
On February 16, 2014 at 1:58 am
Of course you would!
Yup, facts don’t matter to holoco$t true believers and Wiesel Worshippers.
by Shelly
On February 19, 2014 at 2:08 pm
This site makes me sick. Why would millions of people make up a terrible thing like the holocaust? You people are crazy to think that this is all one big lie. You have no proof what-so-ever and have no right to make up these silly lies about a subject that is very horrific for its survivors
by Carolyn
On February 23, 2014 at 4:29 am
dear Shelly says:
Millions? Since when did “millions” of people make up or invent the story of the “holocaust”?? Millions have repeated it, only. If you knew anything, you would know that the holocaust story was invented by the Soviet Union and Stalin’s “anti-fascist” propaganda department, and the Polish underground resistance operating partially out of the Auschwitz labor camp/Birkenau concentration camp, in cooperation with the Polish government in exile in London. Much, if not most, of this was Jewish. Hundreds, not millions, of people were involved.
What you must do is to isolate even one lie from the articles here – then copy it and link to it – then describe in writing how and why it is a lie and state what the truth of the matter is, with evidence to back up your statement. Just making emotional cries of pain is worthless. You are only hurting your cause thereby.