Posted on July 28, 2013 at 3:01 pm
Elie’s Adventures in Buchenland
By Carolyn Yeager
Copyright 2013 Carolyn Yeager
(last edited on 7-30-13)
“How puzzling all these changes are! I’m never sure what I’m going to be, from one minute to another.”
― Lewis Carroll, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
Introduction: In Elie Wiesel’s book Night, we find the scenario and characters changing often, and in many cases, with little rhyme or reason that is apparent to the reader. One easily concludes that, like Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, it is a work of absurdity.
In Lewis Carroll’s classic, nothing makes sense because nothing has to make sense – the intention was to be a “childish” type of foolishness or make-believe from the start. It is an example of literary nonsense (1) genre. Interestingly, we find similar examples of nonsense and absurdity in many of the stories and writings of self-proclaimed “holocaust survivors” – and we put Elie Wiesel into this category. This is why Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland is such a good fit for a parody of Elie Wiesel’s Night.
Cast of Characters:
Elie = Elie Wiesel
White Rabbit = Ken Waltzer
Father = no such person has been found
The King and Queen of Hearts = SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV)
The Duchess = Hilda Wiesel
The Cheshire Cat = Carolyn Yeager
The March Hare = Antonin Kalina, Czech communist block leader
The (Mad) Hatter = Gustav Schiller, Polish Jew block leader
Elie is quite bored one warm afternoon at the Jewish orphan’s mansion in France where he lives. This is not unusual for Elie, who has absolutely nothing to do all day but play chess or study the Talmud or other holy texts of which he is known to be almost fanatically fond. Today, though, no one was around the chess table that had been set up outdoors under a large tree, and Elie becomes a bit dreamy, maybe even sleepy. He is suddenly brought wide awake again when he sees a White Rabbit run by, looking at its pocket watch and muttering “Oh dear, oh dear, I’m going to be late!”
Elie, having never heard a rabbit speak to itself before, let alone have a pocket watch, impulsively runs after the comical creature right into a large rabbit hole. He feels himself slowly falling a long distance before he comes to solid ground. When he does, an unrecognizable landscape of trees, shrubs and creatures such as he has never seen before greets his blinking eyes, and a feeling of being an innocent young girl in an enchanted garden comes over him.
Before he can wonder too much at this, he catches sight of the White Rabbit again and follows him until he is stopped by a barbed wire fence. Standing before it, just the thought of how he might squeeze through the wires to the other side as the rabbit did causes him to shrink to just the right size to step through. As he does—suddenly—he is in a closed railway car with many other people, Jews like himself.
Elie is so unhappy at this turn of events he begins to cry. He cries so much and so hard his tears flood the rail car, making all the others inside very angry, including his own late father whom now, however, seems to be very much alive. As the water made up of Elie’s tears rises closer to the top of the boxcar, the door opens and the inhabitants swim out with the rushing flood.
Appearing for all the world like a catch of wet fish flapping on the platform, the unfortunates find themselves being questioned by a large Caterpillar-looking officer seated on a high stool smoking a hookah. But not one of them is able to answer the officer’s questions as to the particulars of who they are.
“I’m afraid I can’t explain myself, sir. Because I am not myself, you see?”
― Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
The Camp Buchenland
The hookah-smoking officer tires of their inability to name themselves and, pointing in a certain direction, tells them to march that way to a camp where they will get dry clothes. Once there, the group lines up in an open assembly area and is told they are in Buchenland, the kingdom of the Queen of Hearts who, in spite of her kindly-sounding name, gives orders that must be obeyed. Ordered to now go to the showers where they would also receive the promised new clothing, Elie and Father already fail to obey.
The entrance to the showers is crowded with pushing, shoving people. Father sits down on the ground outside, “I can’t go on anymore; I’ll wait here until we can go into the showers.” As the two lose themselves in an argument over the subject of impending death, the electric lights go out and a loudspeaker commands that all must now be in their assigned barracks.
In haste, Elie follows a crowd into a nearby barracks, where, still unshowered, he falls to the floor and sinks into a dreamless sleep. It is only in the morning that he realizes he is alone; he must have lost his father in the rush to the barracks, and then forgotten about him! Going in search, he wanders about the camp for hours, unmolested by any officers or guards of the Kingdom. Happening upon a place where coffee is being distributed, he gets in line for a cup and magically hears the voice of his father calling to him.
From then on, for the next 7 days (as well as days can be counted in Buchenland), Elie keeps coming back to his father, looking after him in a rather haphazard fashion. Father is not well, not well at all, and Elie, “for a ration of bread,” is able to secure a cot next to his father in the barracks.(2) But a few days later, Elie is sleeping on the upper bunk, above his father, because of his (Elie’s) bandaged foot.(3)
The time comes that Father passes his last breath in his bunk during the middle of the night. According to Elie’s reckoning, it is February 8th-9th, 1945. But elsewhere, Elie states his father died on the night of January 28-29, and again on the 18-19 of Shevat, 5705, which corresponds to February 1st.(4) Elie is both secretly relieved and personally devastated over the loss of Father and blames it on the cruelty of the officials of the Kingdom of Buchenland, calling it murder.
The Queen of Hearts learns about young Elie’s defamations against her health care system, and at the same time the multiple death dates he asserts for his father, and proclaims with great indignation that this cannot be allowed in her Kingdom. The King agrees and they summon the culprit to their presence. After listening to Elie’s disconnected narrative of how he came to be in Buchenland and how he lost his father, she loses patience with the constantly changing versions of his story and shouts “Off with his head!”
Elie is put on trial
Elie is taken to court to be tried for the offense of butchering his father’s date of death. The King and Queen are seated on the high bench. Elie is formally charged with reckless endangerment of the facts of his father’s death. To everyone’s surprise, The Duchess arrives at the court, accompanied by her cat, and asks to testify for the accused. She is granted her request and takes the stand.
You know, [father and son] did a long march from Auschwitz, then they put them on the train to go to Buchen[land]; [Father] died gasping for air. When he stepped off the train, he died gasping for air; at Buchen[land]. But [Elie] knew the date.(5)
The Queen frowns; she is impatient of such testimony that adds even another version of the death in question—what can The Duchess be up to anyway? Then the Duchess’ Cheshire Cat begins to speak, saying the entire court is out of order because the father of the defendant is not the same as the 44-year old man who actually died and is listed in the Buchenland death records; therefore the date that Elie’s father died is irrelevant. Angered to hear it said that her court is out of order, the Queen shouts “Off with his head!” pointing to the Cheshire Cat. As the Queen’s guards move toward the cat to seize him, he cleverly disappears his body, leaving only his head for the spectators to see. How then can his head be chopped off?
Realizing she has been outwitted by a cat, the Queen then turns to Elie and declares him “Guilty! Off with his head!” As Elie is being escorted to the place of execution, he and his guards meet up with the Cheshire Cat again, now sitting in a tree. The Cat advises them to go to the March Hare’s house instead, warning, however, that the Hare is quite mad. “But then, everyone here is mad,” the Cheshire Cat adds with a grin, before he disappears altogether, leaving only his grin still floating in the air.
“Who in the world am I? Ah, that’s the great puzzle.”
― Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
The Hatter’s Tea Party
The White Rabbit is again spotted running ahead as if leading them to the house of the March Hare, which turns out to be another barracks, this one called the “Children’s Block.” Inside, the Hare and his companion The Hatter (also mad—in fact “mad as a hatter”) engage the children in a continual tea party intended to take their minds off the dreariness of their surroundings.
Elie, feeling grateful (for a change) to still have his head on his shoulders, takes a place at the tea table. He is hoping for something good to eat, as he has now lost interest in everything around him except food. But while the Hare and the Hatter provide nothing in the way of food themselves, Elie still finds the tea party routine—one of constantly changing seats, asking unanswerable riddles and reciting nonsensical poetry— much to his liking.
The Hatter has red hair, carries a big stick and likes to boss the children around in his Polish Yiddish. The March Hare is actually of Czech origin and is known to be at his most mad during the month of March, which it happens to be at this very time. Thus do the days pass in the children’s block.
The overthrow of the Queen
However, when the month of April rolls round, the Queen of Hearts discovers that Elie has been hidden in the house of the March Hare and commands the whole place be evacuated. Every day, for several days, Elie is marched to the camp gate with the other children—rumor has it either to be taken away and disposed of or to be given bread and marmalade outside the gate—but every day he is stopped right before the gate and returned to the March Hare’s house. No marmalade and no explanation given.
On the 11th, the enemies of the Queen from outside Buchenland arrive in such great numbers that all the King and Queen’s guards are forced to flee, leaving Buchenland in the hands of the Mad Hatters and the March Hares. In their celebratory mood, on the third day of what they term the “liberation,” they throw open the Queen’s royal pantries and a real party begins. Elie greedily gorges himself on whatever comes first to hand, causing a poisonous shock to his system. He falls unconscious, is taken to a hospital and doesn’t recover for two weeks.
Buchenland doesn’t even notice Elie’s absence. The new owners are busy taking photographs(6), writing publicity propaganda and giving tours of the place. Hunting down every last subject of the former Queen also occupies their attention. The non-descript intruder named Elie (not the only one so named!) is quickly forgotten.
But for this particular Elie, when he awoke again, it was like being reborn. The absurd world he had found himself in after following that White Rabbit down the rabbit hole existed no more; he was back at the mansion in France, unthreatened by any harm. It must have been a dream, he thought. But then, “I shall write about what I remember—now, before I forget. Even though it didn’t really happen, perhaps it could have happened. And since it’s there in my mind like a memory, that makes it real enough! Plus it’s a jolly good story.” So, going inside the mansion, he found paper and pencil and began writing of his amazing adventure in Buchenland, as he remembered it. And he called it Night.
“Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”
― Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
Endnotes:
1. Literary nonsense (or nonsense literature) is a broad categorization of literature that uses sensical and nonsensical elements to defy language conventions or logical reasoning.
Nonsense is distinct from fantasy, though there are sometimes resemblances between them. Everything follows logic within the rules of the fantasy world; the nonsense world, on the other hand, has no system of logic, although it may imply the existence of an inscrutable one, just beyond our grasp.
2. “For a ration of bread I was able to exchange cots to be next to my father.” Night, Marion Wiesel translation, 2006, p.108.
3. “The sick stayed in their bunks [during roll call]. My father and I thus stayed inside. He — because of his dysentery and I — because of my bandaged foot. Father was lying in the lowest bunk and I — in the uppermost.” Un di Velt hot geshvign, 1955, p.235.
The bandage refers to the foot operation the fictional Eliezer had before he left Monowitz on or about Jan. 15-16. Could he still be wearing the same bloody bandage he arrived with? Of course not—which means he received treatment that he doesn’t want to tell about.
There is no mention in Night that Wiesel’s foot was still bandaged after 7 days in Buchenwald, and that he could be considered “not fit” for even the ordinary routine. After the march on foot to Gleiwitz, from Auschwitz, Elie never again refers to his foot in Night.
4. http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/night-1-and-night-2%E2%80%94what-changes-were-made-and-why-part-two/
5. From Hilda Wiesel’s testimony to the Shoah Foundation in 1995. According to the time line in Night, she is speaking of February 1, 1945. According to the official time line, it is Jan. 26, 1945. http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/night-1-and-night-2%E2%80%94what-changes-were-made-and-why-part-two/
6. Including the Famous Buchenwald Liberation Photo, taken on April 16, 1945 in Barracks #56 while the fictional Eliezer was in the hospital recovering from his fictional food poisoning.
Categories Featured | Tags: Alice in Wonderland, Camp Buchenland, Cheshire Cat, Childrens Block, Elie Wiesel, Hilda Wiesel, Ken Waltzer, Lewis Carroll, literary nonsense, Night, Queen of Hearts
Leave a Reply
By submitting a comment here you grant Elie Wiesel Cons the World a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.
15 Comments to Elie’s Adventures in Buchenland
by gmathol
On July 29, 2013 at 6:25 am
I don’t like this! Nobody should joke about Buchenwald.
…but the Jews don’t own the Holocaust! There were more none Jews murdered than Jews!
by Jett Rucker
On July 29, 2013 at 7:53 am
Truly, this IS a breakthrough in the exegesis not only of Night, but of Wonderland as well.
The nonesense genre has gained a noble accession indeed! One that people say they (somehow) believe. And that they say we, also should (somehow) believe!
Believe what, exactly?
by Carolyn
On July 31, 2013 at 4:42 am
Thanks Jett, for this thoughtfully intelligent and complimentary comment. I do wish I got more.
Believe what? Yes, you certainly got it. I was wanting to find another way to present the unreliability of Wiesel’s “testimony” because of its numerous, changing versions. We’re all so used to laughing at him and pointing out the impossibilities and craziness, but then we’re accused of insensitivity to “feelings” — as with gmathol’s comment above. Prof. Ken Waltzer teaches courses in “holocaust” using only survivor memoirs — Elie Wiesel’s Night being one of several he considers accurate and reliable. Of course, none of them are. What kind of scholarship is this? At the university level! It’s a scam, pure and simple.
That will have to be my next posting.
by Falkenstein
On July 31, 2013 at 9:50 am
The German prisoners in Russia were tortured by the Bolsheviks after the war, some the the prisoners were even close to Adolf. Guess what? They never got tortured because of the Jewish situation.
That to me should be researched some more.
I find this very very interesting.
Quote:
“Er sagte über seine Gefangenschaft in Russland, dass ihm während dieser ganzen Jahre nicht ein einziges Mal eine Frage in Bezug auf die „Judenverfolgungen“ gestellt worden sei. Weder bei den Verhören in den Sowjetlagern durch Juden, noch in seiner engsten Umgebung im Führerhauptquartier sei jemals eine „Ausrottung von Juden“ angesprochen bzw. erwähnt worden. Er habe erst nach seiner Rückkehr nach Restdeutschland von den angeblichen Verfolgungen erfahren.” – Rochus Misch
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Misch,_Rochus
Translation ???:
“He said about his captivity in Russia, that never once a question during all these years was raised in relation to the persecution of the Jews. Neither during interrogation in Soviet camps by Jews, nor to his immediate surroundings at his headquarters was it ever addressed or mentioned this plan about the “extermination of Jews.” He had learned only after his return to Germany the rest of the alleged persecution.
If this is indeed true one can not help but continue to wonder about how a mere belief in history increases not a relationship to G?d but increases utter stupidity. I am sure the Russians would have been eager to address the issue if they would be aware how important it is to the Jews – the winners of the war.
Truth… one must remember is ultimately the truth… it has nothing to do with hatred but with love and ethical living.
Mere “believe” not based on evidence creates stupidity (stupor) and not a greater sense of compassion, empathy and humanity sense of communal responsibility. If that would be the case, the Germans would not be exploited and would have their peace contract and human rights back. You know Germans do not have human rights because they are considered an enemy state even today after 70 years of war. It is disgusting really.
Just watch how Germany is used to take the riches away from the Europeans to be given to the financial dictators. They get into debt and then the land is owned by the financial dictators. Then comes the i-chip and Germans will vanish from the globe. History of the future will have nothing to do with what really happened but is going to be remodeled after the prophecies of the Bible and the Talmud. It is going to be interesting – except peoples suffering will be greater and greater. I am very worried about the fate of humanity.
In any case… The future seems dark for all of humanity not just for the Germans. Nothing will turn out better for any people on earth when people who despise the rest are in power. One cannot help but wonder, “who are the haters?”
One thing is sure… Elie Wiesel is not a lover of humanity either. He cultivates contempt and cannot be taken as an example of humanitarian good will. Plus his tales are really a waste of time. As I said, mere believe in narratives leads to stupor. Anybody can believe in a peace of ??? – Good service minded actions and good intentions, however, reveal a good person.
by Carolyn
On August 1, 2013 at 3:05 am
False history is what concerns me very much. (Based on that, we have to wonder about all the history we accept now, don’t we?) But we do know for sure the false history of WWII, and also to some lesser degree of WWI, and how the holocaust myth is set to not only remain in place, but to grow, grow, grow. That is a real battle we must fight against in my opinion. Without our true history, we are lost.
by Charlie Knight
On July 31, 2013 at 11:32 pm
i seek the truth about WWII and I feel I am not getting it from most sources. So far I am getting the figures of 6 million Jews being killed by Germany, and that figure goes down yearly but the original number was 6 million, back in the early 1900s before Hitler was in power and maybe before World War One. And then the over 70 Million killed under communism during about that same period of time. Then, the other day I heard of about 110 million killed by other forms of communism, such as in China.
I heard of over 300 written testimonies defending the German prisoners at Nuremberg being dismissed without being red by the tribunal. Something is not right here. I do not doubt that German soldiers and even “special units” had as their goal to kill many Jews. But I have seen NO PROOF that the concentration camps were created as “death camps” for the extermination of Jews. I do see an effort to push Jews out of Germany and later to push them out of “occupied territories”.
I seek the truth and I fear that what the United States and the United Kingdom, and even France are becoming is worse than the boys were told they were fighting against in WWII.
I think the following is truth.
“Amongst the ‘self-righteous’ there is NO righteousness.”
True righteousness demands a humility and a surrender to God that the ‘self-righteous’ lack by the very fact that their righteousness is based on their own acts and not the Grace of God.
I had a discussion the other night about aspects of WWII by many guys from a church men’s groups and was astounded at how well read on the subject the men were, and yet how they treated as “fact” so many things that are just pronouncements from our ‘Allies’ leaders without any shred of facts to back up those statements. That does not mean the statements need to be false, it just means that without facts to back them up I would rather have them be seen as “so and so said” instead of “it happened thus and so” when the “it happened thus and so” has NO empirical fact to back them up.
Am I alone in all of this?
I doubt it. I think enough people are beginning to look at history, United States of America, and others and realizing that what we were told as truth was mostly lies. Take the way the U.S. government broke just about every treaty they made with the American “Indians” they found on this land when they arrived. Since that is now found to be truth, it calls into question every other “truth” that has been proclaimed. Things about WWII in the U.S. that have nothing to do with Jewish people have now been found not to be as we were told they were. So how should that falsehood somehow be absent when the topic is about the Jewish heritage and religious affiliation peoples.
Mostly, our children today do not want propaganda stories, from either side of the question, we want the truth. How it really was. Only then can we “deal” with the past and move on to the future.
by Carolyn
On August 1, 2013 at 3:13 am
You answered your own question, but I will say “no, you’re not alone” also. This is of the utmost importance to understand and to present to others. Less emotion, more thinking/reasoning. Thanks for your comment.
by Hailey
On October 14, 2013 at 10:41 am
I find the trivialization of the Holocaust extremely disgusting. It maybe that some don’t believe that Elie Wiesel was an actual part of the Holocaust, but that does not mean anyone has the right to make fun of or make light of a horrific historical event. An event that almost entirely wiped out an entire group of people. There is an amount of dignity that must be maintained when dealing with this horrific time in history.
by Carolyn
On October 16, 2013 at 2:11 pm
Are you the same Hailey who has written to me before? http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/letter-of-the-week/
If so, welcome back! If not, welcome anyway. I’m afraid you’re wrong on every one of your points. Everyone has the right to make fun of anything they want to. That is what keeps the world sane. You may not like it, but you’re not the arbiter of what other people can say and think. You certainly don’t think you should be, do you?
You apparently are totally convinced there is such a thing as the Holocaust and that it was “horrific.” A horrific historical event. A horrific time in history. But of course you were not there, were you? There is plenty of evidence that most of what is said about it never happened. So why should we be treating lies with dignity? That is the quandry, Hailey. If Elie Wiesel is lying about being “an actual part of the Holocaust” (as you imply you think he might be), then why would the others less famous than he not be doing the same?
The years 1941-1945 were “horrific” for many, many people, and for many, many reasons. No one in the area of a war zone was spared the horror except perhaps the Czechs. You need to get out from your indoctrinated university environment and look at this time in history from a wider, freer perspective. I hope you do. Good luck.
Trackbacks