Posted on July 7, 2016 at 10:04 pm
“Elie Wiesel died before he confessed his lies about the Holocaust,” says French website
1986 Nobel Peace prize winner and writer Elie Wiesel (L) stands in front of a photo he claimed to be himself (bottom right hand corner) with other inmates, taken at the Buchenwald concentration camp in 1945, during his post-Nobel visit on December 18, 1986 to the Holocaust Memorial Center “Yad Vashem” in Jerusalem. SVEN NACKSTRAND/AFP/Getty Images)
BY CAROLYN YEAGER
The French website Enquete & Debat (E&D) has been on to Elie Wiesel’s failure to answer questions about his “missing” tattoo since 2012. The Jewish or part-Jewish chief of E&D is Jean Robin, and he is the one who has taken it upon himself, the past four years, to investigate what he calls the Elie Wiesel Affair. Robin has explained his position in this way: “I am also interested in these matters since a part of my jewish family on my mothers side died in Auschwitz, and a great grand father on my father side, Noël Robin, was deported to Buchenwald and died in Dora for resisting the nazis.” [For being active in the French Resistance, he means, just like Paul Rassinier who later turned into a revisionist. -cy]
Elie Wiesel Cons The World premiered on July 13, 2010. Enquete & Debat was established on June 18, 2010, but did not turn its attention to Elie Wiesel until Dec. 24, 2012, two and one-half years later. The first article based it’s information on Nicholas Grüner’s book Stolen Identity, Robin said. He wrote in that first article that they learned about Grüner from the American ‘Brother Nathanael’ (via Alain Sorel, the French négationniste), but Nathanael got most of his information from Elie Wiesel Cons The World. E&D has used an image that was created especially for EWCTW, so I know he is a follower of this site. Robin is careful not to give attention to it, though; he called me an “authentic nazi.”
M. Robin has done a beneficial service, which is much appreciated, by writing and phoning archivists at the Auschwitz-Birkenau state Museum in Oświęcim, Poland and the Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity in Romania, seeking information about Wiesel’s missing tattoo. The head person at the latter premises hung up on him when she learned the object of his call. He has made all of this public.
Unlike me, Jean Robin appears to be truly heartbroken over what he has discovered. He believes in the six million! He has written that he and Nicholas Grüner have repeatedly contacted news media and important figures within the Holocaust establishment with their information, imploring them to publicly question Wiesel, but got only insults or wishy-washy excuses in return. He believes that Wiesel’s forgery damages the Shoah story, and cannot understand why Wiesel is more important to these people than the entire Shoah. I don’t think he suspects, as I believe, that many of them already know the entire ‘Holocaust’ is a lie, but keep it up for the political power it gives them, or fear of that power. In his statement on Wiesel’s death (below), you can notice a tinge of bitterness mixed with the disappointment.
Elie Wiesel died before he confessed his lies about the Holocaust
Elie Wiesel, who lied about his identity, his Auschwitz tattoo that he does not have, and his imaginary detention in Buchenwald, as we have shown, has died. All media will praise a forger of history, whose lies have allowed deniers to create doubt about the Holocaust itself.
On this occasion, we have linked to all the articles we devoted to this infamous character [nine in all -cy], who is an enemy of the Jewish people and of Israel by his lies, his glory totally undeserved.
In my first article of 24 December 2012 [English version here], I wrote: “I am calling on the Jewish community throughout the world, personalities who are concerned about the Holocaust and the future of its memory, as well as major media to take responsibility and compel [Elie Wiesel] to answer the serious questions raised about him. This must be done while MM. Wiesel and Grüner, the two persons mainly concerned in this case, are by chance still alive, but unfortunately won’t be much longer because of their age (they are both over 80 years).” Alas, it is now too late, nobody took responsibility for Mr. Wiesel.
Jean Robin
M. Robin understands, because he uses logic and reasoning, not emotion and fear, that there is no redeeming the Shoah witness Elie Wiesel now. He has died a liar. As the icon’s friends pass away too, will there be anyone to defend him? The United States Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C. must be very undecided as to how to handle their founding chairman from here on. There is no doubt he did not have the tattoo on his arm – never had it. There is also no doubt that the “important Holocaust figures”–what I’ve been calling the Holocaust Lobby–were unwilling to allow the question to be asked. Indeed, and in fact, they joined in the lying (such as claiming Wiesel to be in the famous Buchenwald liberation photo) to help him get a Nobel Peace Prize. The top media liar would be the New York Times, followed by the Associated Press (AP), NBC and PBS, but all the rest went along too. While M. Robin will not consider the Holocaust-Shoah to be a hoax, he knows that “l’affaire Wiesel” is a hoax and that puts everyone who went along with it into question, whether he wants that or not.
Categories Featured | Tags: Auschwitz tattoos, Elie Wiesel Cons The World, Enquete & Debat, Jean Robin, New York Times, Nicholas Gruner, USHMM
Leave a Reply
By submitting a comment here you grant Elie Wiesel Cons the World a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.
12 Comments to “Elie Wiesel died before he confessed his lies about the Holocaust,” says French website
by a reader
On July 8, 2016 at 5:46 am
A most interesting development on the E&D website is the July 4th story: Claude Lanzmann accuse Elie Wiesel de n’être resté que 4 jours à Auschwitz.
(Claude Lanzmann accuse Elie Wiesel to have stayed for only 4 days in Auschwitz)
French national radio France Inter called director Claude Lanzmann, (of SHOAH fame) expecting him to deliver the tearful eulogy Saint Wiesel deserves.
Unfortunately, Lanzmann gave a scathing indictment of our notorious Surlievor and reported Wiesel stayed only 3 or 4 days and night in Auschwitz, he was only in Buchenwald, explaining he holds this information from 2002 Nobel Prize in Literature, Imre Kertesz.
Despite the impeccable credentials of both accusers, needless to say the online interview was quickly removed from France Inter site; but this is the Internet and here it is.
(at 5:18, in French only, sorry)
Let’s hope the next step will be a public acknowledgement Wiesel was never in Auschwitz, nor Buchenwald.
Carolyn, I think your extraordinary work all these years will bear its fruits, sooner rather than later.
Congratulations.
by Carolyn
On July 8, 2016 at 6:37 am
Thanks very much, reader. There has always been dislike of, and competition with, Elie Wiesel by some elements within the holohoaxers, nothing new, but I do think things are looking up. :)
According to your Wiki link, Imre Kertesz criticized Stephen Spielberg’s Schindler’s List as kitsch.
by HELEN
On July 8, 2016 at 11:17 am
what did we ever do without you?
If the truth prevails, its folks like you who are the front line warriors.
I am a proud German american and am 86 yrs old…hoping by some miracle to see our kind smash the forces of darkness.
by Dave
On July 8, 2016 at 5:08 pm
Its very fitting that this lying, poisonous scum died in Ju-ly, because every wicked, selfish, self-serving thing he claimed at the expense of the actual truth was a JEW LIE.
Helen – I have Nordic blood in me also. The entire global post-war narrative – perpetuated by the servants of Satan lying jews has literally formed and shaped the world since the end of the war and before.
They poisonously control the news (news by jews), the banks and finance, the music and movie scene – everything that can be used to brainwash others and advance their dark and sinister agenda.
They control the imagery we see, the perversely distorted “news” we hear and the music that is so influential in our psyches. They have a stranglehold on the collective mindset of the world. The EXACT thing that SATAN seeks to do.
Does anybody think that’s a sheer COINCIDENCE? If you do, I have a Great Wall in China I’d like to sell you.
This guy was an insidious liar. What’s even more diabolical is that he KNEW he was deceiving most of the world the whole time and allowed himself to be viewed as such a humane and benevolent hero in the process.
I have absolutely no personal doubt that this person currently resides in hell.
by Antidote
On July 9, 2016 at 11:41 pm
When Eric Hunt confronted Eely Weasel in that elevator he didn’t lay a finger on him; he merely asked him a couple of questions. Yet Weasel afterwards said, ‘It was the most frightening thing that ever happened to me….’
More Frightening than Mengele’s selection? More frightening than the cattle cars? More frightening than the burning babies? More frightening than the advance of the Soviets?
Indeed, I believe him. It must have been a terrifying moment when the possibility of his being caught in his web of lies and publicly censured entered his consciousness.
He wasn’t a witness. He wasn’t a saint. He wasn’t even a competent writer. He was a liar, a slanderer and a fraud.
by Evelyn
On July 18, 2016 at 4:37 am
Another article you have posted here, about if Lazar Wiesel & Elie Wiesel are related, intrigues me. Do you think it’s possible that Lazar wrote “Night” and died sometime after the liberation of Buchenwald (or became seriously mentally impaired), and Elie Wiesel took his writing and identity in order to preserve and honor his memory and story? This would tie in with the tattoo issue very nicely, as many Holocaust survivors and Jews still live in fear of Anti-Semitism, and would explain why Elie would not want to show his wrist, to not question the identity that he has taken on.
by Carolyn
On July 18, 2016 at 1:40 pm
Well, Evelyn, you are missing large parts of the picture. So no, I don’t think it’s possible that Elie Wiesel “took” Lazar Wiesel’s writing and identity in order to preserve and honor his memory and story. While it’s possible he took it, there is no evidence to back that up. And we have to go by evidence, not well-meaning narratives.
I think you’re just another Jewish defender of Wiesel, always trying a new approach. This gives you away: “many Holocaust survivors and Jews still live in fear of Anti-Semitism”. If/when they do live in fear it is because they are guilty as hell of lying and defaming the German people, and fear the truth becoming widely known.
If he’s “honoring” the memory of Lazar Wiesel, why would he hide that fact? Have you thought through what you’re saying?
by Alexander
On April 13, 2017 at 6:10 am
Don’t get me wrong I believe that Wiesel is a liar but I don’t understand why Carolyn believes that anyone who tries to defend Wiesel must be Jewish. I am Jewish and I think he is a fraud
by Carolyn
On April 24, 2017 at 3:04 pm
Alexander is referring to my reply to Evelyn’s comment above. I don’t say that “anyone” that defends Wiesel is a Jew, but I do get a lot of silly excuses for his lies from obvious Jews. You are right, though, that I should have just answered Evelyn’s question without suggesting that she was a Jew. I was wrong to do that.
To you, Alexander, do you question the number 6 million? Do you question the “gas chambers” (which Wiesel never spoke of). Do you question the plan, goal or desire to “exterminate” all Jews? Do you recognize any other liars among the ‘survivors’? Or is it only Wiesel you see as a fraud?
by Wendy
On December 8, 2017 at 3:24 am
I’m slightly confused yon this. I see what you’re saying, I see the inconsistencies, which are making me curious about the validity of him, but are you saying nobody died during the Holocaust (I know people died, happens every day, but deaths by what we all learned about the Holocaust)? Was Auschwitz actually a luxury concentration camp? I’m just very confused by this.
by Carolyn
On December 9, 2017 at 9:51 am
Wendy – Of course, I’m not saying nobody died during the “Holocaust”. But should what happened be called a holocaust, let alone “The Holocaust?” We have a problem already with the naming of it. It was a massive deportation of Jews to the east – certainly not nice for them, and many (but still a small percentage) died in the process – but no real evidence the intent was to kill or ‘exterminate’ them.
I’m also not saying Auschwitz was a luxury camp. You can read my booklet on Auschwitz at my personal website. Any deterioration of conditions at the camps were brought about by increased Allied bombing of Germany and the demands of war production. There is no need to be confused.
by Hawaiiguy
On July 14, 2021 at 12:57 am
All very good points Carolyn, its been a good while but i remember some “holocaust” interviews of survivors talking about football clubs, chit systems, orchestra nights etc. Which all seemed legit and credible, which is the baffling part. How can an entire planet, especially the west, hear this and still think, well they must have gassed them after the championship game and the ovation? Humanity is in serious trouble, and why haven’t “American Patriots” taken up arms against the illegal belligerent 2020 government? As far as I am concerned American politicians have zero legitimacy and must be taken out to try and save the republic.