Posted on September 12, 2011 at 10:08 am
Gigantic Fraud Carried Out for Wiesel Nobel Prize
By Carolyn Yeager
Proof that the man in the famous Buchenwald photograph is NOT Elie Wiesel.
With the help of the New York Times and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, Elie Wiesel and his backers did not shy away from criminal deceit by purposely misidentifying an unknown face in this famous photo as belonging to Elie Wiesel.
The above high-resolution photograph of Buchenwald survivors was first published in the New York Times on May 6, 1945 with the caption “Crowded Bunks in the Prison Camp at Buchenwald”. [click on image twice to enlarge fully] It was taken inside Block #56 by Private H. Miller of the Civil Affairs Branch of the U.S. Army Signal Corps on April 16, 1945, five days after the Buchenwald camp was liberated by a division of the US Third Army on April 11, 1945. None of the men in the picture were identified at that time.
The U.S. Army photographer was in block #56, not #66
The U.S. Army photographer said he was inside Block #56. The “children’s block” that housed the so-called “boys of Buchenwald” was #66. This was not a typo. Note that these men are not children or teenagers, except for the youngster on the lower left who has been correctly identified as 16 yr. old Myklos (Nikolaus) Grüner, and maybe a couple others. These adults appear to be a mixture of sick individuals suffering from a wasting disease (Grüner learned after liberation he had TB), along with basically healthy men who were also in that block, for some unknown reason, five days after they had been freed. As we have read from many Buchenwald inmates, they moved about at will from the day of liberation onward. In Elie Wiesel’s book Night, he even says that some of the boys in his block went to the city of Weimar the very next day to steal potatoes and rape girls.
The true facts of this photograph have never been told and perhaps are not known. (Grüner has written in Stolen Identity that he left a procession of youths being led to the camp entrance on the morning of April 11, scurried into the nearest barracks and jumped into an empty bunk space. It turned out to be this one.) But because of the man standing there stark naked except for a piece of clothing held in his hands to cover himself, this photograph was certainly staged. In any event, it was never represented as the “children’s barracks.” Still, Elie Wiesel inexplicably once told an interviewer for the German weekly Die Zeit that this photograph was taken in the Children’s Block and all these men were really teenagers even though they looked old. (Source: “1945 und Heute: Holocaust,” Die Zeit, April 21, 1995.)
Kenneth Waltzer wrote to this website EWCTW on Nov. 14, 2010: “Eli Wiesel was indeed the Lazar Wiesel who was admitted to Buchenwald on January 26, 1945, who was subsequently shifted to block 66…” and Waltzer repeated in another comment on June 27, 2011 that “— after his father died — Elie Wiesel was moved in early February to block 66, the kinderblock. Miklos Gruner too was in block 66. Elie Wiesel was there with other boys from Sighet, who knew him.”
But we are also to accept that on April 16 Wiesel was in block 56, even though he didn’t report any such move in his book Night. In fact, in that fictitious story, Wiesel says he became deathly ill with food poisoning three days after liberation (April 14) and spent the next two weeks in hospital (pg 115, Marion Wiesel translation). That in itself precludes his being in this photograph taken on April 16!
Whom do you believe—the New York Times or your own eyes?
Not Wiesel at age 16 in 1945
You can see for yourself from these two high-quality photographs supplied to me by a helpful reader that the face on the left is not Wiesel. A close inspection of the prisoners in the bunks in the famous photograph reveals that the eyebrows on many (including the one on the left above) were emphasized with a dark crayon/pencil … in other words, retouched or “photo-shopped.” On the right is what is claimed to be Elie Wiesel in 1944 at the age of 15.
The inmate on the left definitely has an aquiline nose and full, even sensual, lips. In this close-up, the receding hairline is visible on the recently shaved head. On the right, the real 15-year-old Elie Wiesel exhibits a normal youthful hairline, a bigger and longer nose and thinner lips. He also has a higher forehead and longer face than the more roundish-headed inmate. The eyes of the man on the left are not as deep-set under the eyebrows. His somewhat surprised, curious expression is not typical of Wiesel, whose expression was generally reserved, and often hooded.
The close-up on the left appears to be the real Elie Wiesel in France later in 1945. He would be 17 or almost 17 years old in this picture. Notice the non-receding, youthful hairline with a very long front lock hanging to the side, and the straight nose .
This close-up image is from the photograph below, which is found at the USHMM Survivor Resource Center with the caption given below. (click here or on lower pic for an undistorted, larger image)
Above, Jewish boys gather for a prayer service in a chapel in an OSE children’s home in 1945. Those pictured include Elie Wiesel (seen in profile) and Jakob Rybsztajn standing next to him facing the camera. (I note that Elie Wiesel is older than the other boys in this picture, giving support to the idea that he acted in the role of counselor and sometime teacher to the newer, younger religious boys.)
Notice again the straight nose, the high forehead, deep-set eyes, large ears, sensitive mouth and slender neck. But also look at all that hair! The date of this picture is given by USHMM as 1945 and the location as Ambloy, [Loir et Cher] France. It says in the accompanying text “In October 1945 the children and staff of Ambloy were relocated to the Chateau de Vaucelles in Taverny (Val d’Oise).” That means this picture was taken between June and October 1945. They could have been celebrating Rosh Hashana, Yom Kippur or Sukkot.
But could his hair have grown to such a length from a shaved head in April 1945? No way, and thus we have another proof that the liberated Buchenwald inmate with the shaved head is NOT Elie Wiesel.
A PDF from my valued contributer examines the ages of the small group more closely. In my opinion, he has the ages of all four men a little too young but especially #2 and 4. Take a look: four men in bunk
Who first identified Elie Wiesel in the famous Buchenwald liberation photo?
In October 1983 the Jewish-owned New York Times published this photograph as part of an article in its high circulation Sunday NYT Magazine with the caption: “On April 11, 1945, American troops liberated the concentration camp’s survivors, including Elie, who later identified himself as the man circled in the photo.”
It was also in 1983 that Wiesel’s friend Sigmund Strochlitz began campaigning for a Nobel prize for Wiesel. Letters of nomination are due into the Nobel committee by Feb.1 of each year, so by January 1984, the committee was receiving letters nominating Wiesel from U.S. Senators such as Daniel Moynihan and Barry Goldwater (both Jewish). [see “How Elie Wiesel Got the Nobel Peace Prize“] The effort continued, with new and ever more innovative ideas, through 1985 and 1986 with the help of Jew John Silber, President of Boston University, Wiesel’s employer. Hundreds were enlisted into the effort.
The 1983 article in the New York Times that was the opening gun of the campaign was written by Jew Samuel Freedman and titled “Bearing Witness: The Life and Work of Elie Wiesel.” It included this line: “His name has been frequently mentioned as a possible recipient of a Nobel Prize, for either peace or literature.” Well, it had just begun to be mentioned … by this team of cheerleaders.
Wiesel pretends that he had nothing to do with it. In an interview in France in 2009, he said: “If you fight or if you do scientific research to get the Nobel, you never succeed and you should not succeed.” (Elie Wiesel, “messager de la memoire”) No, he did not fight but his mercenaries fought for him, and he used this photograph as his “research.” That this photograph played a large role is shown by the fact that immediately after the Nobel award ceremony in December 1986, Wiesel went to Yad Vashem Memorial in Jerusalem and posed in front of its prominent display there.
Elie Wiesel on Dec. 18, 1986 at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem
After the award was announced by the Nobel Committee, the New York Times published on Nov. 1 a severely cropped version of the Buchenwald photo (below) with the caption: “Elie Wiesel, the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize (at far right in the top bunk) in the Buchenwald concentration camp in April 1945, when the camp was liberated by American troops.” The picture accompanied an article by Jew Martin Susskind titled, “A Voice from Bonn: History Cannot Be Shrugged Off.”
The role played by the tax-payer funded United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
Elie Wiesel finagled his way to becoming Founding Chairman of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council in 1980 after being chosen in 1978 by President Jimmy Carter as chairman of the President’s Commission on the Holocaust. Why the United States needed to do anything at all about the “Holocaust” is something only the 2.5% Jewish population in this country can answer. It is to satisfy them. Wiesel continued to chair the Council until 1986, when he reached his goal of becoming a Nobel Laureate. The USHMM was undoubtedly an important institutional heavyweight that leveraged him to the Nobel.
The USHMM naturally accepted that Wiesel was in the famous photograph as soon as he and the New York Times said he was. If you think the museum staff does real research, is searching for truth and/or is engaged in scholarship of any kind, you are badly mistaken. The museum represents official power only and is invested in keeping it in Jewish hands.
This photograph is the only document tying Elie Wiesel to the Holocaust
The only document that connects Elie Wiesel to the Auschwitz-Birkenau and Buchenwald experience he claims to have—in other words, his claim to be an authentic “Holocaust survivor”—is the famous Buchenwald liberation photograph. There are no records with his name and birth date for either camp. His books do not support his presence there very well. That’s why the Wiesel promoters, who wanted to anchor their man’s claim to be the unchallenged spokesman for the world’s greatest victims—which winning a Nobel prize would surely do—decided that they could pawn that unknown face off as the face of Wiesel. This decision was made in 1983. It’s certain that Elie Wiesel took part in making it, though the pretense is kept up by all that he was aloof from the entire process.
What you must do
When you comprehend the immense power that this simple photo comparison and commentary gives us, you know that we have it in our hands to break down the Wiesel legend if this knowledge is widely circulated. If you understand this, you know what you must do. You must post this article everywhere you can, you must tell everyone about it, send it to all you know … make sure that this photo comparison moves through the Internet and finds a home in as many places as possible. And keep it up, because once is not enough. I’ve done my part, readers. Now it’s up to you.
Categories Featured | Tags: Ambloy France, Block 66, boys of Buchenwald, Buchenwald liberation, Elie Wiesel, Holocaust fraud, Ken Waltzer, Myklos Gruener, New York Times, Nobel Peace Prize, OSE, US Holocaust Memorial Museum, USHMM
Leave a Reply
By submitting a comment here you grant Elie Wiesel Cons the World a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.
54 Comments to Gigantic Fraud Carried Out for Wiesel Nobel Prize
by Ray Goodwin
On September 12, 2011 at 10:32 pm
Great work in helping to expose this FRAUD. Let’s spread it far and wide; you never know how effective a little ray of the light of truth can be in breaking the hold of the darkness!!
by Carolyn
On September 13, 2011 at 4:38 pm
Ray,
Yes, let’s do. And it’s essential that it be clearly stated when doing so that Elie Wiesel was NOT at Buchenwald. If he was not at Buchenwald, his father was not at Buchenwald. Therefore, they were not on the “death march” to Buchenwald. Therefore they didn’t leave Auschwitz-Birkenau to go the Buchenwald. Therefore, it’s all a lie.
Do I need to spell this out more clearly? Probably so.
by Ministry Of Truth
On September 13, 2011 at 9:58 am
You could use this during his next appearance.
by Jett Rucker
On September 13, 2011 at 1:28 pm
Most Nobel prizes are awarded to frauds, for their frauds. Barack Obama (Peace), for example.
Ignoring Nobel and other such prizes also would go a long way toward neutralizing the frauds (but they DO still receive $1 million, which would certainly console ME, AND justify at least a certain amount of fraud).
by Carolyn
On September 13, 2011 at 4:11 pm
Jett,
This is about much more than the Peace Prize, or peace in general.
by J M Damon
On September 13, 2011 at 2:09 pm
How fitting that the Dynamite Peace Prize should go to the world’s foremost imposter.
by J M Damon
On September 13, 2011 at 2:14 pm
Hey Bradley —
I just realized my stupid computer misspelled “impostor.”
by Carolyn
On September 13, 2011 at 3:46 pm
Bradley isn’t here. I take care of this site all by myself and always have. I take some offense at the assumption that Bradley is responsible for any of the research or writing here.
Carolyn
by Shlomo Golddigger
On September 13, 2011 at 5:28 pm
Dr.Mengele inflicted horrendous torture upon Elie Wiesel while experimenting on human hair color change. I remember how Elie vowed to keep silent despite the tremendous pain. That’s what made him look older; the physical pain added to the moral determination to keep his mouth shut.
I WAS THERE.
I am on the 2nd row, 2nd from left.
by Reverend Cailen Cambeul
On September 13, 2011 at 8:11 pm
Thanks to your research, the game’s pretty much finished for Das Wiesel. No KZ time, no photos in striped PJ’s and no tattoo to display. All that are left for Elie now are labels that he fabricated and pinned on himself. Well, at least now he now has a genuine label: Holocaust Liar.
by Hans Schneider
On September 14, 2011 at 8:27 am
a certain race is not known for its honesty and correctness at all….
by JonnyX
On September 14, 2011 at 11:06 am
@Schlomo; Yeah, that’s what Elie says too. Can you prove it any more than he can? Are you the guy whose back is to the camera? Sure, I’ll beleive that the one guy whose back is turned just happened to be you, why the heck not? But did Mengele do plastic surgery to Elie’s nose and mouth, and then return it to it’s previous condition after this shot was taken? Oh wait, that would be impossible…
by Big Fish
On September 14, 2011 at 11:13 am
I despise deceitful people. Particularly those who behave in such fashion to profit off others. I can’t wait until “Weasel’s” story fully disintegrates – hope he remains alive to feel the heat and shame.
by Nick
On September 14, 2011 at 1:01 pm
The Nobel Peace Prize was awarded in 1986.
In April 1987 the jewish atheist writer Primo Levi of Turin (age 67), also candidate for this Nobel Prize and former inmate of Auschwitz, committed suicide or was suicided, falling from the stairs of his apartment bloc.
by Phineas
On September 18, 2011 at 10:52 am
“Most Nobel prizes are awarded to frauds, for their frauds. Barack Obama (Peace), for example.
Ignoring Nobel and other such prizes also would go a long way toward neutralizing the frauds (but they DO still receive $1 million, which would certainly console ME, AND justify at least a certain amount of fraud).”
Martin Luther King and Yassar Arafat,as well.
by truthlover72
On September 18, 2011 at 8:22 pm
Thanks, Carolyn! Great job!
Who was it who said: “If a Jew’s lips are moving, he’s lying; and if a Rabbi is present, a crime has already been committed.”, or something to that affect?
I think whoever said it, it should be embraced as a ‘principle’ for all non-Jews to never let slip their minds.
Thank God for the access so many of us have now to the TRUTH, which the Jews hate as much as they hate Jesus Christ, Who was NOT a ‘Jew’, but an Israelite of the tribe of Judah. Jesus exposes the lying ‘Jews’ in Revelation 2:9 & 3:9 to be IMPOSTORS who insinuate themselves as ‘Judahites’, when, in fact, they are the SYNAGOGuE OF SATAN, descendants of Esau, Jacob’s evil twin brother who vowed to rob Israel of birthright and blessings.
Edomites are a mongrelized race, Esau having mixed with genetically perverted Canaanites, Hitites and other ‘ites’. And his descendants continued to mix with Turks, Mongols, and others; settled in the Volga and plagued their neighbours with their barbarism and thievery. They adopted
‘Talmudism'(Judaism)in 740 A.D. and became such a pestilence to neighour nations that they were driven off.
The Edomites/Khazars were expelled from 109 other nations, having been caught trying to corrupt and destroy them from within. It wasn’t until the English invented the new word ‘Jew’ in the 18th century that the Edomite/Khazars started calling themselves ‘Jews’.
‘Jews’ are themselves a fabrication, and like Jesus tells us, they are LIARS, and of their ‘father, the devil’, murderers and thieves. And it’s high time those of us who are not ‘Jews’ stand up and TRUTH them right in their faces at every turn and opportunity. Let them call us ‘antisemitic’. ‘Semitism’ is ‘Jew-hatred toward all non-Jews’. ‘Anti-semitism’ means to be against ‘Jew-hatred toward all non-Jews’.
I have a conscience, ergo, I am an ANTI-SEMITE’!
by Roy
On November 5, 2011 at 10:27 pm
Worst article of all time.
by Shelby
On November 20, 2011 at 9:11 am
Really people so what he lied about a picture he was still there. Leave him alone. He has been through more in his life than you can ever imagine. So leave it be. Don’t ruin the rest of a mans life cause you are unsatisfied with yours.
by Daniel
On November 22, 2011 at 7:17 pm
I am sure that possible Damage Control is being prepared for the eventuality at this very moment. Unfortunately direct photo comparisons will be hard to ovoid and counter.Once you make a lie on something you must stick to it even if it’s a noose around your own neck!!! Unfortunately, Elie has made a mint on Jewish suffering. Unfortunately for him Truth will triumph!!!!
From a Jewish Christian
by Alex
On November 27, 2011 at 7:46 pm
In Sengwarden, Northern Germany, in a DP camp I met a Jew who was refused entry into US. He was repatriated back to the originating camp. Reason: He served in the SS, and his SS ID was identified from the lists of wanted SS men.
by Truthseeker
On February 7, 2012 at 11:07 am
Bravo a Nobel Peace Prize for Fakery
by Otto Grein
On May 8, 2012 at 10:05 pm
To deny that the Holocaust happened is to deny the testimony of Jews, Germans, Nazis, and the Americans who liberated the victims. Elie Wiesel is not the issue here. Please educate yourself.
by Carolyn
On May 9, 2012 at 8:08 am
“Please educate yourself” (said in different ways) is the message I receive from most ‘believers’ with their phony names. And, like you, they show no sign they have educated themselves! First you have to define what is the Holocaust that “happened” to say whether someone denies it or not. And Elie Wiesel IS the issue at this Web site, like it or not.
by principled joyce
On May 11, 2012 at 9:22 am
is anyone really surprised by any of this?its been happening for decades. the media, politicians of all persuasions,business corporations and of course all of the international bodies, charities and organisations,love the publicity involved by denouncing an unbeliever. why cant they have a televised forum, where both sides can put there arguments down on the table, backed up by hard facts? although, this was tried some years ago by David Irving, at oxford university, but as usual the left wing, public school educated, middle class intellectuals who all seem to live in hampstead on hearing this quickly turned into a snarling baying mob, refused to have such a historical revisionist, on their campus and in true yob fashion scaled the walls and stormed the chamber where the meeting was to be held. discussion ended. these spoilt little rich kids will one day stand for parliment, succeed and so the deception will continue.
by Thomas Mayer
On June 6, 2012 at 7:32 pm
How dare you! You deny a survivor of these horrors his only compensation for this trauma? Far greater substantial evidence has been given than this trivial matter. Tell me something; why would a man create for himself a reputation such as this? He is not a hero. It is not heroic. Do you think he began lying because he could foresee a Nobel prize? You accusers are such miniscule beings that the rest can easily dismiss you, but what you are doing is enormously cruel. Many have denied men for doing great deeds, but you deny this man for his suffering, which was done for the purpose of informing ignorant people like you of horrors that developed with ignorance like yours. A man is capable of surviving such horrors, a great deed, and with all turmoil that goes with it, you must contribute your typical criticism. Did you survive a holocaust? Is this why you give this man such disdain, that he claims a position that you deserve caliber for? You never experienced his turmoil, you can only add to it.
by wakaflocka
On December 18, 2012 at 12:57 am
No one grows hair that fast.
In the pictures in 1945 you showed him at age 16 with short hair, then another picture of him in 1945 with long hair? That is wacky.
by Alyssa
On December 28, 2012 at 12:43 pm
I’d just like to say that he won the Nobel Peace Prize for delivering a message of “peace, atonement and human dignity” to humanity, not for surviving the Holocaust. Fraud or not, he still opened the world’s eyes to the horrors of the Holocaust, which is something very few people have done. His writing have made a very deep emotional impact on many people and is a reminder of human cruelty.
by Gefiltefishy
On March 3, 2013 at 9:53 am
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived, and dishonest, but the Myth, persistent, persuasive, and dishonest
John F. Kennedy
by Carolyn
On March 3, 2013 at 11:45 am
Well, there is plenty of myth about JFK, isn’t there?
by Raymond Howard
On October 22, 2013 at 3:22 am
While Elie Wiesel, is indeed a fraud, there is one book, by Ralph Franklin Keeling, (pub. 1947) “Gruesome Harvest) that does depict a genocide, per Allied statistic source, and witness, that isn’t quite Stalin’s Purge, (The Great Terror), by Robert Conquest, (pub. 1968) of around at least 20 million killed by Stalin, of Soviet citizens. In Gruesome Harvest, it is an account of Allied atrocity, that occured at the very end of the war throug the first years of “peace time” in Germany, with the culpability between the hatred and ineptness of Dwight D. Eisenhower, and the policy measures of the United States, under the subsequent Morgentau Plan. No, we do not just applaude and promote frauds, like Elie Wiesel with Nobel Peace prizes, we elect not unlike German’s did Hitler, similar genocidal maniacs into office. The difference is, ironically per ‘ideaology’ is we don’t do it under the auspice of Communism, or Fascism obviously, we do it under the guise of “Mom and Apple pie”, Capitalistic Democracy! By way of “to the victor go the spoils, and otherwise “indifference” that Elie Wiesel talks about glibly, although revels in it, we ignore our shortcomings of crimes against humanity with impunity.
by john reynolds
On February 4, 2014 at 6:09 am
So this lying weasel, was robbed of all his ill gotten gains by Maddoff. Karma.
by Carolyn
On February 4, 2014 at 12:21 pm
john r – Wiesel was certainly not robbed of ALL his ill-gotten gains. He is still very rich.
Why has “karma” now become so popular? It’s overly simplistic.
by joe3/4"
On May 9, 2015 at 3:50 am
I quit coloring my hair, and had it cut down to about 3/4″ on top and tapered into a shave over my ears and down the back. That was at the beginning of the summer, after school let out (I am a teacher, and the 20″ difference may have shocked my students); so, about 10 WEEKS later, I had it evened-out and styled a little differently before school began again. Even after the new cut, it was still 2-3″ longer than it had been 10 WEEKS earlier. So, your haircut/hairline theory…empty straws as far as I’m concerned. The major difference in your presentation and Elie’s – he WAS there!
by Carolyn
On May 9, 2015 at 12:21 pm
joe 3/4″,
The big debate surrounding Elie Wiesel is whether he was in Buchenwald. The evidence points to NO, he was not. Believers ignore all that and just believe.
Your “testimony” on your own hair growth (with no proof offered) means nothing. Let’s compromise between June and October and make it August, 1945 when that picture with Elie’s long hair.was taken. In mid-April “Elie” was bald. Four months later he had hair of exceptional length – looks like it’s 6 to 8 inches long on the top. That’s not possible. In addition, the hairline is definitely receding in the barracks picture, which is not the case for the Elie in August picture, and is never the case with a teenager!
Another thing you don’t know, but the eyebrows of many of the faces in the barracks picture have been painted over with black, including the false “elie” character. It’s obvious when looking at a high quality enlargement, as I have done. [The retouching was always very poor.] So this false “elie” probably had much lighter eyebrows and it looks like he had lighter colored hair comparable to the first man of the four in that bunk (on the left). Notice his light-colored eyebrows.
Sorry joe, but he WAS NOT there.
by swedish reader
On May 12, 2015 at 2:25 pm
What someone remembers will be tainted by the holocaust propaganda.
Recently. There was this film on swedish television.
http://everyfacehasaname.com/
The women look quite healthy. Looking at the Facebook page, I found a man complaining about the women, saying they could absolutely not come from the concentration camps.
https://www.facebook.com/EveryFaceHasAName
Below is his complaint, I translated it to english;
Thomas Johansson, 24 april kl. 07:03
“I must ask you a rather unpleasant matter of the documentary. My mother came to Malmo in 1945 after having been in several camps, among others Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen. Mom was appalled when she saw the documentary. She just gaped then she became very sad .. They do not come from any camp she exclaimed .. Why? Well, because nobody from those images or movie came from the camps !!! How can she say so ??? Easy … They did not look that way …. They had no barb, but were skeletons, they had no hair on it was cut off in the camps and did not grow back because of malnutrition. They had no clothes no things they were wandering ghosts. Mangus why present this lie ??????? Please come to my home and make a documentary with my mother and you will get the truth.”
by Joel
On July 4, 2016 at 9:42 am
Some Holocaust Historians have claimed that The drop in the total number from 4 million to a million & 1/2 deaths at Auschwitz shouldn’t affect the total of 6 million since it is calculated differently. According to some publications (Jewish Authors) it was always known that the 4 million Auschwitz figure was too high (they say due to Russian and Polish influence) and was closer to 1 – 2 million. What I feel is problematic is that there was always behind the scenes strong Jewish influence at the museum and this lower number was not pushed in the media. I sense it was the release of the Auschwitz death registers (Ca. Late 1970’s) which (although incomplete) showed in the area of 70,000 deaths at Auschwitz, a number closer the the Red Cross Figures that probably led to the total official reduction in the Auschwitz number.
by Joel
On July 4, 2016 at 9:54 am
I find the comparison of the Photos pretty convincing. Wiesel probably searched high and low for a “convincing” photo and found this one. He later won the Nobel prize after he convinced the Jewish higher ups he “was” there. In my opinion the individual in the photo is definitely a different person than the 16 year old Elie despite some weight loss and rigors received in internment at the camp. I believe Elie is a fraud and this is unfortunate for the Holocaust community. The powers that be in the Holocaust community obviously cannot at this time reveal the fraud as it would definitely upset the “apple cart” so to speak. Too many claims by fraudulent Jewish individuals have recently been exposed even on TV ( for at least one) to my amazement.
by Joseph A. Magil
On March 19, 2017 at 1:37 am
Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Barry Goldwater were both Jewish? Wikipedia ways that Moynihan went to St. Raphael’s Catholic church and attended parochial schools. I am aware of no Jewish heritage for Moynihan. Wikipedia also states that Barry Goldwater had a Jewish father but was raised Episcopalian like his mother. Please correct me if I am wrong; my only source is Wikipedia.
by Carolyn
On April 24, 2017 at 2:46 pm
to Joseph – I guess Daniel Patrick Moynihan is portrayed as so Jew-friendly that I got the impression he was a Jew. I may have actually read it somewhere. Did it come from his growing up in NYC and representing the state for so long? This is how one Jewish website described him:
And on and on …
Barry Goldwater was born of a Jewish father, as you admit, which makes him genetically Jewish.
by Shade
On September 9, 2021 at 5:37 am
Unbelievably individual pleasant website. Great information offered on couple of gos to.
Trackbacks